<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Academics:  Still Totally Lame</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/</link>
	<description>Random samplings from a universe of ideas</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 21:59:21 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: The Story So Far&#8230; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ten Guilty Pleasures</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-305566</link>
		<dc:creator>The Story So Far&#8230; &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Ten Guilty Pleasures</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Dec 2007 16:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-305566</guid>
		<description>[...] Some time ago Brad DeLong linked to this post over at Cosmic Variance...&#160; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Some time ago Brad DeLong linked to this post over at Cosmic Variance&#8230;&nbsp; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Vice Vice Baby &#124; Cosmic Variance</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-303129</link>
		<dc:creator>Vice Vice Baby &#124; Cosmic Variance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2007 15:08:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-303129</guid>
		<description>[...] we&#8217;ve already decided, are sadly unfamiliar with guilty pleasures. But you know who are the true experts? Public radio show [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] we&#8217;ve already decided, are sadly unfamiliar with guilty pleasures. But you know who are the true experts? Public radio show [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sarapen</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301624</link>
		<dc:creator>Sarapen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Sep 2007 02:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301624</guid>
		<description>From The Guardian: &lt;a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/weekend/story/0,,2003615,00.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;Guilty pleasures of intellectuals&lt;/a&gt;

It's slightly more salacious, listing pro wrestling, Stalinist nostalgia, and Project Runway.  There's nothing in it about beating off to coffee table books about architecture or anything really interesting, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>From The Guardian: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/weekend/story/0,,2003615,00.html" rel="nofollow">Guilty pleasures of intellectuals</a></p>
<p>It&#8217;s slightly more salacious, listing pro wrestling, Stalinist nostalgia, and Project Runway.  There&#8217;s nothing in it about beating off to coffee table books about architecture or anything really interesting, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Gerard Prinster</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301520</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Gerard Prinster</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Sep 2007 14:47:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301520</guid>
		<description>What I find pathetic about most of their responses is that they're all of the "job interview question" category:  "Well, sir, I'd have to say that my greatest weakness is just &lt;i&gt;working too hard&lt;/i&gt; and &lt;i&gt;loving the company too much&lt;/i&gt;."  Give me a break.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What I find pathetic about most of their responses is that they&#8217;re all of the &#8220;job interview question&#8221; category:  &#8220;Well, sir, I&#8217;d have to say that my greatest weakness is just <i>working too hard</i> and <i>loving the company too much</i>.&#8221;  Give me a break.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Julianne</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301482</link>
		<dc:creator>Julianne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 22:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301482</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;how about making tee shirts that say “once you have tenure its all edible panties, firearms and blow”&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Done!  See http://cosmicvarance.spreadshirt.com

Sadly, we couldn't do mugs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>how about making tee shirts that say “once you have tenure its all edible panties, firearms and blow”</p></blockquote>
<p>Done!  See <a href="http://cosmicvarance.spreadshirt.com" rel="nofollow">http://cosmicvarance.spreadshirt.com</a></p>
<p>Sadly, we couldn&#8217;t do mugs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BlackGriffen</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301481</link>
		<dc:creator>BlackGriffen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 21:39:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301481</guid>
		<description>I think I may have the worst guilty pleasure for an academic - tests. I actually enjoy taking and acing a nice, challenging test. Nothing too grueling, mind, but a good couples hours of test is a thrill and its invigorating to come out knowing that you effing owned that thing.

What makes this one so bad is that it leads to ostracism both by your peers and the general populace.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think I may have the worst guilty pleasure for an academic - tests. I actually enjoy taking and acing a nice, challenging test. Nothing too grueling, mind, but a good couples hours of test is a thrill and its invigorating to come out knowing that you effing owned that thing.</p>
<p>What makes this one so bad is that it leads to ostracism both by your peers and the general populace.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Katie</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301445</link>
		<dc:creator>Katie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 14:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301445</guid>
		<description>Seriously, Mark, how about making tee shirts that say "once you have tenure its all edible panties, firearms and blow"? I'd so totally buy one. I know a bunch of assistant professors who'd buy one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Seriously, Mark, how about making tee shirts that say &#8220;once you have tenure its all edible panties, firearms and blow&#8221;? I&#8217;d so totally buy one. I know a bunch of assistant professors who&#8217;d buy one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Russell Blackford</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301432</link>
		<dc:creator>Russell Blackford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 10:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301432</guid>
		<description>Well, I've been known to read novels by people like Greg Egan - but I can't think of anything else off-hand. Where's my "angel" smiley, goddammit?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I&#8217;ve been known to read novels by people like Greg Egan - but I can&#8217;t think of anything else off-hand. Where&#8217;s my &#8220;angel&#8221; smiley, goddammit?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roger Giner-Sorolla</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301429</link>
		<dc:creator>Roger Giner-Sorolla</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 09:58:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301429</guid>
		<description>Wait, she admits to enjoying opening a textbook - presumably for teaching purposes?  If you're up for tenure at a Big State University, that's downright perverse.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait, she admits to enjoying opening a textbook - presumably for teaching purposes?  If you&#8217;re up for tenure at a Big State University, that&#8217;s downright perverse.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mel Anderson</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301425</link>
		<dc:creator>Mel Anderson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 08:57:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301425</guid>
		<description>I think Greg Egan has hit the nail on the head.  The culture of "coolness" is harming kids' perception of how the world actually works.  Witness the decline of the hard sciences in universities in the UK.  I read SF as a kid, and thought maths was "cool".  I was thought geeky by my peers because of it. Still am, to some extent.

Incidentally, Greg, glad to hear you're writing SF again, looking forward to "Incandescence" next year.  I think I have just about all of you books, including "An Unusual Angle".</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think Greg Egan has hit the nail on the head.  The culture of &#8220;coolness&#8221; is harming kids&#8217; perception of how the world actually works.  Witness the decline of the hard sciences in universities in the UK.  I read SF as a kid, and thought maths was &#8220;cool&#8221;.  I was thought geeky by my peers because of it. Still am, to some extent.</p>
<p>Incidentally, Greg, glad to hear you&#8217;re writing SF again, looking forward to &#8220;Incandescence&#8221; next year.  I think I have just about all of you books, including &#8220;An Unusual Angle&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301350</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 17:21:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301350</guid>
		<description>I wonder how much of the absence of actually interesting guilty pleasures on the part of these people is the result not of being in academia but something else - i.e., are the people who answered the question married and in their late 30s, like me?  Because back when I was single and in my late 20s, I was in academia, but I actually had guilty pleasures.  I don't anymore because I have a wife and daughter now, not because of anything having to do with academia.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder how much of the absence of actually interesting guilty pleasures on the part of these people is the result not of being in academia but something else - i.e., are the people who answered the question married and in their late 30s, like me?  Because back when I was single and in my late 20s, I was in academia, but I actually had guilty pleasures.  I don&#8217;t anymore because I have a wife and daughter now, not because of anything having to do with academia.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crooked Timber &#187; &#187; Publish You&#8217;re Squarish</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301340</link>
		<dc:creator>Crooked Timber &#187; &#187; Publish You&#8217;re Squarish</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:48:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301340</guid>
		<description>[...] of interest to sociologists of academia, this post by Sean Carroll on how pathetic academics can be when they&#8217;re asked to disclose their &#8216;guilty [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] of interest to sociologists of academia, this post by Sean Carroll on how pathetic academics can be when they&#8217;re asked to disclose their &#8216;guilty [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: daisy rose</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301338</link>
		<dc:creator>daisy rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 13:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301338</guid>
		<description>Guilt is a useless emotion -</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guilt is a useless emotion -</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Yasaman Farzan</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301321</link>
		<dc:creator>Yasaman Farzan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 06:19:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301321</guid>
		<description>Does curving out and eating 7 kilos of  watermelon with a spoon  and putting back the rest in the refrigerator (instead of sliding a little piece and putting it in plate to eat) count as a guilty pleasure in American culture?
Not that I do such a thing!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Does curving out and eating 7 kilos of  watermelon with a spoon  and putting back the rest in the refrigerator (instead of sliding a little piece and putting it in plate to eat) count as a guilty pleasure in American culture?<br />
Not that I do such a thing!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Armstrong</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301320</link>
		<dc:creator>John Armstrong</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 05:35:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301320</guid>
		<description>Guilty pleasure: paying attention to popular culture.  Man I loves me some Britney-bashing.  Sure, plenty of other people do it, but are academics "supposed" to?

On the other hand, does it take the "edge" off it if I then use the pop-culture trivia as foddor for ridiculing Critical Theory?  I'm still rather proud of my "queer reading" of "The Sign", by Ace of Base.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Guilty pleasure: paying attention to popular culture.  Man I loves me some Britney-bashing.  Sure, plenty of other people do it, but are academics &#8220;supposed&#8221; to?</p>
<p>On the other hand, does it take the &#8220;edge&#8221; off it if I then use the pop-culture trivia as foddor for ridiculing Critical Theory?  I&#8217;m still rather proud of my &#8220;queer reading&#8221; of &#8220;The Sign&#8221;, by Ace of Base.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neil B.</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301319</link>
		<dc:creator>Neil B.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 02:00:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301319</guid>
		<description>One of my guilty pleasures is arguing about metaphysical issues like God's existence, the contingent nature of observed reality, the meaning of existence, multiple universes, modal realism, etc. in stupefyingly deep, perplexing, and intricate ways.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One of my guilty pleasures is arguing about metaphysical issues like God&#8217;s existence, the contingent nature of observed reality, the meaning of existence, multiple universes, modal realism, etc. in stupefyingly deep, perplexing, and intricate ways.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Baez</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301316</link>
		<dc:creator>John Baez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:46:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301316</guid>
		<description>Reading this blog is one of my guilty pleasures.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Reading this blog is one of my guilty pleasures.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mxracer652</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301315</link>
		<dc:creator>mxracer652</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:35:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301315</guid>
		<description>@ Peter E,
True, but we're talking about two different things, riding for exercise/transportation is one thing, training to be a semi/pro cyclist is entirely different.  

I think the point Hacker admits is that the amount of time that is necessary for training cuts into your family time, hence its inherent selfishness/guilty pleasure status.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@ Peter E,<br />
True, but we&#8217;re talking about two different things, riding for exercise/transportation is one thing, training to be a semi/pro cyclist is entirely different.  </p>
<p>I think the point Hacker admits is that the amount of time that is necessary for training cuts into your family time, hence its inherent selfishness/guilty pleasure status.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sysrick.com</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301314</link>
		<dc:creator>sysrick.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 01:28:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301314</guid>
		<description>[...] Academics: Still Totally Lame [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Academics: Still Totally Lame [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ben</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301310</link>
		<dc:creator>Ben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 22:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/2007/09/24/academics-still-totally-lame/#comment-301310</guid>
		<description>Doesn't the incredulous (even disapproving) response to McCloskey's lame pleasure at cracking a textbook perversely validate her?  I mean, she's right - now it &lt;i&gt;is&lt;/i&gt; a guilty pleasure.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t the incredulous (even disapproving) response to McCloskey&#8217;s lame pleasure at cracking a textbook perversely validate her?  I mean, she&#8217;s right - now it <i>is</i> a guilty pleasure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
