<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: US/LHC Blogs</title>
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/09/21/uslhc-blogs/</link>
	<description>Random samplings from a universe of ideas.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 21 Nov 2008 18:47:50 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Ellipsis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/09/21/uslhc-blogs/#comment-32278</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellipsis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Oct 2007 09:46:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/09/21/uslhc-blogs/#comment-32278</guid>
		<description>The &lt;a href="http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/icc/icc2007-08/icc2007-08.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;minutes of the most recent LHC Installation Coordination Committee meeting&lt;/a&gt; appear to now be public, for those of you that want every detail from the experts.  See especially the talks from &lt;a href="http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/icc/icc2007-08/veness.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;Ray Veness on the plug-in module status&lt;/a&gt; and from &lt;a href="http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/icc/icc2007-08/foraz.pdf" rel="nofollow"&gt;Katy Foraz on the general coordination schedule&lt;/a&gt;.  No announced updates to the latter yet, that will probably wait for Lyn Evans's talk at the ATLAS Week next week.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The <a href="http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/icc/icc2007-08/icc2007-08.pdf" rel="nofollow">minutes of the most recent LHC Installation Coordination Committee meeting</a> appear to now be public, for those of you that want every detail from the experts.  See especially the talks from <a href="http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/icc/icc2007-08/veness.pdf" rel="nofollow">Ray Veness on the plug-in module status</a> and from <a href="http://lhc.web.cern.ch/lhc/icc/icc2007-08/foraz.pdf" rel="nofollow">Katy Foraz on the general coordination schedule</a>.  No announced updates to the latter yet, that will probably wait for Lyn Evans&#8217;s talk at the ATLAS Week next week.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Seed's Daily Zeitgeist: 9/24/2007 - General Science</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/09/21/uslhc-blogs/#comment-32266</link>
		<dc:creator>Seed's Daily Zeitgeist: 9/24/2007 - General Science</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 23:41:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/09/21/uslhc-blogs/#comment-32266</guid>
		<description>[...] US LHC Blog US-based physicists working on the LHC give you the inside scoop. (via CV) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] US LHC Blog US-based physicists working on the LHC give you the inside scoop. (via CV) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: f15mos</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/09/21/uslhc-blogs/#comment-32267</link>
		<dc:creator>f15mos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Sep 2007 00:04:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/09/21/uslhc-blogs/#comment-32267</guid>
		<description>Hi Ellipsis,

Thanks for posting the link that I posted before. I started to suspect that the subject of vacuum fingers and resulting LHC delay is some kind of tabu and information is being censored.

Also, as I understand CERN council did not shift the schedule so I can surmise they either still evaluating the impact on the schedule or impact is negligible. The latter I doubt as beam on May 2008 is goal w/o any contingencies. So not to mention helium production.

I do not want to seem nasty, but what I hear from experts of all sort - first beam in the machine in September 2008. Now, in CDF it took 2 years to get physics quality data and that is with "old" detector and experienced personnel. Here we have humangous detectors and crowded collaborations so I do not see how the schedule of getting physics data can be more optimistic than at the Tevatron experiments.
So, this puts us in the beginning of 2011 when CMS&#38;ATLAS are producing quality data.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Ellipsis,</p>
<p>Thanks for posting the link that I posted before. I started to suspect that the subject of vacuum fingers and resulting LHC delay is some kind of tabu and information is being censored.</p>
<p>Also, as I understand CERN council did not shift the schedule so I can surmise they either still evaluating the impact on the schedule or impact is negligible. The latter I doubt as beam on May 2008 is goal w/o any contingencies. So not to mention helium production.</p>
<p>I do not want to seem nasty, but what I hear from experts of all sort - first beam in the machine in September 2008. Now, in CDF it took 2 years to get physics quality data and that is with &#8220;old&#8221; detector and experienced personnel. Here we have humangous detectors and crowded collaborations so I do not see how the schedule of getting physics data can be more optimistic than at the Tevatron experiments.<br />
So, this puts us in the beginning of 2011 when CMS&amp;ATLAS are producing quality data.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellipsis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/09/21/uslhc-blogs/#comment-32277</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellipsis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/09/21/uslhc-blogs/#comment-32277</guid>
		<description>Wordpress appears to have mistakenly added the comma to the end of that URL, http://simkiott001.blogspot.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wordpress appears to have mistakenly added the comma to the end of that URL, <a href="http://simkiott001.blogspot.com" rel="nofollow">http://simkiott001.blogspot.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellipsis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/09/21/uslhc-blogs/#comment-32270</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellipsis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Sep 2007 15:53:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/09/21/uslhc-blogs/#comment-32270</guid>
		<description>The link f15mos posted, http://simkiott001.blogspot.com, looks entirely correct to me.  There's certainly a variation in how serious the current problems are viewed to be (and likely will be until they are fixed).  It is considered likely that the full present and future combination of issues will probably end up pushing the startup until at least the end of 2008, if not perhaps beyond.  The PIM copper finger problems have been and are under intensive study.  We'll hear a lot more in the next couple weeks.

Just to note: I am clearly and most certainly _not_ any sort of official spokes-blog-commenter or anything of the sort.  I comment only because no one else did and because there really is no public relations official or any specific person responsible for answering people's questions on blogs.  So please take what I say with a grain of salt just as you'd take any other anon/pseudonymous commenter (or named one).  (The main reason why I am pseudonymous is that if/when I say something stupid, I don't want to end up pilloried for it!)  Cheers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The link f15mos posted, <a href="http://simkiott001.blogspot.com," rel="nofollow">http://simkiott001.blogspot.com,</a> looks entirely correct to me.  There&#8217;s certainly a variation in how serious the current problems are viewed to be (and likely will be until they are fixed).  It is considered likely that the full present and future combination of issues will probably end up pushing the startup until at least the end of 2008, if not perhaps beyond.  The PIM copper finger problems have been and are under intensive study.  We&#8217;ll hear a lot more in the next couple weeks.</p>
<p>Just to note: I am clearly and most certainly _not_ any sort of official spokes-blog-commenter or anything of the sort.  I comment only because no one else did and because there really is no public relations official or any specific person responsible for answering people&#8217;s questions on blogs.  So please take what I say with a grain of salt just as you&#8217;d take any other anon/pseudonymous commenter (or named one).  (The main reason why I am pseudonymous is that if/when I say something stupid, I don&#8217;t want to end up pilloried for it!)  Cheers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/09/21/uslhc-blogs/#comment-32276</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 17:57:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/09/21/uslhc-blogs/#comment-32276</guid>
		<description>Sorry - I just realized I accidently erased it and can't find it now. Please post it again. Sorry once more.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sorry - I just realized I accidently erased it and can&#8217;t find it now. Please post it again. Sorry once more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: f15mos</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/09/21/uslhc-blogs/#comment-32275</link>
		<dc:creator>f15mos</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 25 Sep 2007 13:30:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/09/21/uslhc-blogs/#comment-32275</guid>
		<description>why my comment was removed?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>why my comment was removed?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ellipsis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/09/21/uslhc-blogs/#comment-32274</link>
		<dc:creator>Ellipsis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 05:17:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/09/21/uslhc-blogs/#comment-32274</guid>
		<description>There have been some problems, but no disasters, despite some very incorrect rumors that "grew legs", so to speak.  No changes to the schedule have been announced or decided yet.  If changes are made, the recent issues would more likely (guesswork here) result in relatively small changes (i.e. a couple of months rather than a year).  Large problems are entirely possible between now and design luminosity running, but the recent ones are not of that scale.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There have been some problems, but no disasters, despite some very incorrect rumors that &#8220;grew legs&#8221;, so to speak.  No changes to the schedule have been announced or decided yet.  If changes are made, the recent issues would more likely (guesswork here) result in relatively small changes (i.e. a couple of months rather than a year).  Large problems are entirely possible between now and design luminosity running, but the recent ones are not of that scale.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: N. Peter Armitage</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/09/21/uslhc-blogs/#comment-32273</link>
		<dc:creator>N. Peter Armitage</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 18:13:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/09/21/uslhc-blogs/#comment-32273</guid>
		<description>I heard some rumors floating around that there were some more - possibly major - complications found with the LHC commisioning.

Anyone else confirm or deny?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard some rumors floating around that there were some more - possibly major - complications found with the LHC commisioning.</p>
<p>Anyone else confirm or deny?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Baez</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/09/21/uslhc-blogs/#comment-32272</link>
		<dc:creator>John Baez</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 22 Sep 2007 16:59:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2007/09/21/uslhc-blogs/#comment-32272</guid>
		<description>I like &lt;a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCq1LalDDZ0" rel="nofollow"&gt;this movie&lt;/a&gt; of a trip from space to the LHC to the ATLAS detector and inside.

Even cooler is this &lt;a href="http://www.petermccready.com/portfolio/05091901.html" rel="nofollow"&gt;rotatable view&lt;/a&gt;.  The grid of white lines on black you see before the view comes into being reminds me of the holodeck on Star Trek.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like <a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XCq1LalDDZ0" rel="nofollow">this movie</a> of a trip from space to the LHC to the ATLAS detector and inside.</p>
<p>Even cooler is this <a href="http://www.petermccready.com/portfolio/05091901.html" rel="nofollow">rotatable view</a>.  The grid of white lines on black you see before the view comes into being reminds me of the holodeck on Star Trek.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
