<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: But We Feel Good About Ourselves</title>
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/05/but-we-feel-good-about-ourselves/</link>
	<description>Random samplings from a universe of ideas.</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 04:03:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Savyasachi</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/05/but-we-feel-good-about-ourselves/#comment-20993</link>
		<dc:creator>Savyasachi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Oct 2006 04:46:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/05/but-we-feel-good-about-ourselves/#comment-20993</guid>
		<description>Since there is no proof that science curricula in these countries were standardized, what sense does this comparison make?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Since there is no proof that science curricula in these countries were standardized, what sense does this comparison make?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: damselfly</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/05/but-we-feel-good-about-ourselves/#comment-21009</link>
		<dc:creator>damselfly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Oct 2006 06:41:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/05/but-we-feel-good-about-ourselves/#comment-21009</guid>
		<description>Sean makes the point that "...we don't train our teachers well, provide schools with proper resources, or challenge our students enough in the classroom."

Some good points. But we also need to give teachers some credit. If you  want to teach 8th grade math or science half the job will be dealing with the "problem" students - the child who's totally unsupervised at home &#38; used to doing as they please, whenever they please, the child who's being bullied, the child who's doing the bullying, the chronically disruptive child, the withdrawn child who may be pregnant...just teaching won't be enough. You'll have to be a surrogate parent and social worker as well, and for that -  there are no test scores.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean makes the point that &#8220;&#8230;we don&#8217;t train our teachers well, provide schools with proper resources, or challenge our students enough in the classroom.&#8221;</p>
<p>Some good points. But we also need to give teachers some credit. If you  want to teach 8th grade math or science half the job will be dealing with the &#8220;problem&#8221; students - the child who&#8217;s totally unsupervised at home &amp; used to doing as they please, whenever they please, the child who&#8217;s being bullied, the child who&#8217;s doing the bullying, the chronically disruptive child, the withdrawn child who may be pregnant&#8230;just teaching won&#8217;t be enough. You&#8217;ll have to be a surrogate parent and social worker as well, and for that -  there are no test scores.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Suz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/05/but-we-feel-good-about-ourselves/#comment-20977</link>
		<dc:creator>Suz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Oct 2006 19:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/05/but-we-feel-good-about-ourselves/#comment-20977</guid>
		<description>Thanks for the link to the incompetence article, Allyson... I've been thinking for a long time why so many incompetent people do so well (i.e. get professorships at Harvard or become presidents of Harvard, etc.) and while so many competent people aren't in better positions of power/ prestige.  While it's a different topic, I think the inability to estimate one's (in)abilities is somewhat related.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks for the link to the incompetence article, Allyson&#8230; I&#8217;ve been thinking for a long time why so many incompetent people do so well (i.e. get professorships at Harvard or become presidents of Harvard, etc.) and while so many competent people aren&#8217;t in better positions of power/ prestige.  While it&#8217;s a different topic, I think the inability to estimate one&#8217;s (in)abilities is somewhat related.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allyson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/05/but-we-feel-good-about-ourselves/#comment-21012</link>
		<dc:creator>Allyson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2006 19:25:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/05/but-we-feel-good-about-ourselves/#comment-21012</guid>
		<description>I hate being the threadkiller.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate being the threadkiller.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Allyson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/05/but-we-feel-good-about-ourselves/#comment-20979</link>
		<dc:creator>Allyson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:59:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/05/but-we-feel-good-about-ourselves/#comment-20979</guid>
		<description>Sara T., might as well ask why there aren't more physicists in the NBA.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sara T., might as well ask why there aren&#8217;t more physicists in the NBA.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Florida Citizens for Science &#187; Yet another study</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/05/but-we-feel-good-about-ourselves/#comment-20978</link>
		<dc:creator>Florida Citizens for Science &#187; Yet another study</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 14:38:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/05/but-we-feel-good-about-ourselves/#comment-20978</guid>
		<description>[...] The blog Cosmic Variance points out yet another study about how poorly American students are doing in math and science compared to other countries. The comments in the blog post are great as they hash out the merits and failings of the report. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] The blog Cosmic Variance points out yet another study about how poorly American students are doing in math and science compared to other countries. The comments in the blog post are great as they hash out the merits and failings of the report. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sara T</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/05/but-we-feel-good-about-ourselves/#comment-20961</link>
		<dc:creator>Sara T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Oct 2006 03:18:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/05/but-we-feel-good-about-ourselves/#comment-20961</guid>
		<description>Okay, this IS a complicated issue, but a blog can be for ranting, right?  That's the beauty in a way, part of the discussion.  So, I am gonna say:

A big component of the USA's dismal knowledge of and inappropriate self-confidence regarding science and engineering is HOLLYWOOD [aka Burbank and Culver City].
Or, if you want it a bit narrower, commercial TELEVISION.
Even a show that at least tries to have in its premise logical investigation, like "House," always has to have the mystical, feel good, fuzzy folks WINNING, and House's crumudgeonly but scientific (including the leaps of ideas) approach seen as, okay, problem-solving, but to no good end as it screws him up.
There are no scientists and engineerings producing or directing in Hollywood (I hope someone corrects me!).  There are probably some folks writing, but these things never get on the screen, big or little, in the original form.

Well, I'm sure this is not an original rant and I have some work to do, but felt like weighing in.  A similar rant re elected officials, especially in Congress, would also be appropriate!...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, this IS a complicated issue, but a blog can be for ranting, right?  That&#8217;s the beauty in a way, part of the discussion.  So, I am gonna say:</p>
<p>A big component of the USA&#8217;s dismal knowledge of and inappropriate self-confidence regarding science and engineering is HOLLYWOOD [aka Burbank and Culver City].<br />
Or, if you want it a bit narrower, commercial TELEVISION.<br />
Even a show that at least tries to have in its premise logical investigation, like &#8220;House,&#8221; always has to have the mystical, feel good, fuzzy folks WINNING, and House&#8217;s crumudgeonly but scientific (including the leaps of ideas) approach seen as, okay, problem-solving, but to no good end as it screws him up.<br />
There are no scientists and engineerings producing or directing in Hollywood (I hope someone corrects me!).  There are probably some folks writing, but these things never get on the screen, big or little, in the original form.</p>
<p>Well, I&#8217;m sure this is not an original rant and I have some work to do, but felt like weighing in.  A similar rant re elected officials, especially in Congress, would also be appropriate!&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beauty Factory</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/05/but-we-feel-good-about-ourselves/#comment-20980</link>
		<dc:creator>Beauty Factory</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Oct 2006 14:28:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/05/but-we-feel-good-about-ourselves/#comment-20980</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;ìžì‹ ê°&lt;/strong&gt;

ìµœê·¼ Cosmic Varianceì&#8212; ê³¼í•™ êµìœ¡ì&#8212; ê´€í•œ í¬ìŠ¤íŒ...ì´ ì˜¬ë¼ì™"ë‹¤. ë¯¸êµ­ì˜ ê²½ìš°, 'ìžì‹ ê°ë§Œìœ¼ë¡œ ì¶©ë¶„í•˜ì§€ ì•Šê³  ì‹¤ì§ˆì ì¸ êµì‚¬ êµìœ¡ì´ë‚˜ ì ì ˆí•œ ìžë£Œ ê³µê¸‰, ìˆ˜ì&#8212;...ì&#8212;ì„œì˜ í•™ìƒ ë„ì „ ìœ ë„ ë"±ì´ í•„ìš"í•˜ë‹¤'...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>ìžì‹ ê°</strong></p>
<p>ìµœê·¼ Cosmic Varianceì&mdash; ê³¼í•™ êµìœ¡ì&mdash; ê´€í•œ í¬ìŠ¤íŒ&#8230;ì´ ì˜¬ë¼ì™&#8221;ë‹¤. ë¯¸êµ­ì˜ ê²½ìš°, &#8216;ìžì‹ ê°ë§Œìœ¼ë¡œ ì¶©ë¶„í•˜ì§€ ì•Šê³  ì‹¤ì§ˆì ì¸ êµì‚¬ êµìœ¡ì´ë‚˜ ì ì ˆí•œ ìžë£Œ ê³µê¸‰, ìˆ˜ì&mdash;&#8230;ì&mdash;ì„œì˜ í•™ìƒ ë„ì „ ìœ ë„ ë&#8221;±ì´ í•„ìš&#8221;í•˜ë‹¤&#8217;&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jim Harrison</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/05/but-we-feel-good-about-ourselves/#comment-20967</link>
		<dc:creator>Jim Harrison</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 22:35:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/05/but-we-feel-good-about-ourselves/#comment-20967</guid>
		<description>Let us analyze things as a chemist might. Maybe what matters in determining the scientific prowess of a country is not the average proficiency of its students or the proportion of students who are greatly proficient, but the absolute number of students who are greatly proficient. Does anybody have numbers on that?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let us analyze things as a chemist might. Maybe what matters in determining the scientific prowess of a country is not the average proficiency of its students or the proportion of students who are greatly proficient, but the absolute number of students who are greatly proficient. Does anybody have numbers on that?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: citrine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/05/but-we-feel-good-about-ourselves/#comment-20966</link>
		<dc:creator>citrine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 08 Oct 2006 22:13:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/10/05/but-we-feel-good-about-ourselves/#comment-20966</guid>
		<description>JC on Oct 5th, 2006 at 11:10 pm

There seems to be a disconnect between American kids doing poorly in math + science, and the fact that America is relatively advanced technologically.

If Americans were genuinely "stupid" and/or "lazy", then I would expect the society to resemble something like "Mad Max" and not a technologically advanced society.

*******************************************************

JC,

Some of the contributing factors to this maybe the larger population of the USA - which compensates to some degree the percentage distribution of skills -  and the contributions to the tech workforce from immigrants. Plus the post-WWII boom may have given the USA head start in establishing labs, etc.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JC on Oct 5th, 2006 at 11:10 pm</p>
<p>There seems to be a disconnect between American kids doing poorly in math + science, and the fact that America is relatively advanced technologically.</p>
<p>If Americans were genuinely &#8220;stupid&#8221; and/or &#8220;lazy&#8221;, then I would expect the society to resemble something like &#8220;Mad Max&#8221; and not a technologically advanced society.</p>
<p>*******************************************************</p>
<p>JC,</p>
<p>Some of the contributing factors to this maybe the larger population of the USA - which compensates to some degree the percentage distribution of skills -  and the contributions to the tech workforce from immigrants. Plus the post-WWII boom may have given the USA head start in establishing labs, etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
