<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Future of Theoretical Cosmology</title>
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/04/25/the-future-of-theoretical-cosmology/</link>
	<description>Random samplings from a universe of ideas.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 23:19:37 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Charm &#38;c. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dallas redux</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/04/25/the-future-of-theoretical-cosmology/#comment-15146</link>
		<dc:creator>Charm &#38;c. &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Dallas redux</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 May 2006 04:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/04/25/the-future-of-theoretical-cosmology/#comment-15146</guid>
		<description>[...] First, the truly exciting news: Sean Carroll knows who we are! Or at least knows where this blog is. We&#8217;ve hit the big time in physics blogging! (An editorial we, of course.) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] First, the truly exciting news: Sean Carroll knows who we are! Or at least knows where this blog is. We&#8217;ve hit the big time in physics blogging! (An editorial we, of course.) [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Odyssey and Oracle</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/04/25/the-future-of-theoretical-cosmology/#comment-15145</link>
		<dc:creator>Odyssey and Oracle</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 06:23:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/04/25/the-future-of-theoretical-cosmology/#comment-15145</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;MIT Prof Says Universe Is 'Large Quantum Computer&lt;/strong&gt;

If the universe is a huge computing system (I reject the notion of a giant computer as it is too biased by own current level of technology, I like "Mind" better), then what is the role of consciousness? Is self awareness an intrinsic component of thi...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>MIT Prof Says Universe Is &#8216;Large Quantum Computer</strong></p>
<p>If the universe is a huge computing system (I reject the notion of a giant computer as it is too biased by own current level of technology, I like &#8220;Mind&#8221; better), then what is the role of consciousness? Is self awareness an intrinsic component of thi&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jack</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/04/25/the-future-of-theoretical-cosmology/#comment-15144</link>
		<dc:creator>Jack</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 29 Apr 2006 02:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/04/25/the-future-of-theoretical-cosmology/#comment-15144</guid>
		<description>Talking about the multiverse, anthropic things, etc, I hope everyone saw this rather cool paper:

http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0604134

This, along with Polchinski's latest paper, have caused me to seriously reconsider my previous strong opposition to multiverses and such things. I urge people to read these two papers, forget that they ever heard the name Susskind, and think again about their position on these issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Talking about the multiverse, anthropic things, etc, I hope everyone saw this rather cool paper:</p>
<p><a href="http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0604134" rel="nofollow">http://arxiv.org/abs/physics/0604134</a></p>
<p>This, along with Polchinski&#8217;s latest paper, have caused me to seriously reconsider my previous strong opposition to multiverses and such things. I urge people to read these two papers, forget that they ever heard the name Susskind, and think again about their position on these issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Plato</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/04/25/the-future-of-theoretical-cosmology/#comment-15143</link>
		<dc:creator>Plato</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 17:00:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/04/25/the-future-of-theoretical-cosmology/#comment-15143</guid>
		<description>It didn't to say stop trying to think in new ways TorbjÃ¶rn? Who knows, what could come of it? :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It didn&#8217;t to say stop trying to think in new ways TorbjÃ¶rn? Who knows, what could come of it? <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TorbjÃ¶rn Larsson</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/04/25/the-future-of-theoretical-cosmology/#comment-15142</link>
		<dc:creator>TorbjÃ¶rn Larsson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Apr 2006 16:29:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/04/25/the-future-of-theoretical-cosmology/#comment-15142</guid>
		<description>"untestable predictions of a theory are perfectly legitimate science, so long as the theory makes other testable predictions."

Yes, I finally got that it's ok to add unfalsifiable hypotheses some time ago, which is why I stopped arguing against the string landscape (since string theory is already theoretically tested against older physics) and also tentatively embraced the parsimonious anthropic view. So I will take the opportunity to retract those earlier arguments here, for what it is worth. :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;untestable predictions of a theory are perfectly legitimate science, so long as the theory makes other testable predictions.&#8221;</p>
<p>Yes, I finally got that it&#8217;s ok to add unfalsifiable hypotheses some time ago, which is why I stopped arguing against the string landscape (since string theory is already theoretically tested against older physics) and also tentatively embraced the parsimonious anthropic view. So I will take the opportunity to retract those earlier arguments here, for what it is worth. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/04/25/the-future-of-theoretical-cosmology/#comment-15137</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 16:42:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/04/25/the-future-of-theoretical-cosmology/#comment-15137</guid>
		<description>Oh... the sound of neutrinos surfing the oceanic waves! "The Music of The Neutrinos" might gain an edge over "The Music of The Primes". Great closing story on the future of theoretical cosmology!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh&#8230; the sound of neutrinos surfing the oceanic waves! &#8220;The Music of The Neutrinos&#8221; might gain an edge over &#8220;The Music of The Primes&#8221;. Great closing story on the future of theoretical cosmology!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Count Iblis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/04/25/the-future-of-theoretical-cosmology/#comment-15141</link>
		<dc:creator>Count Iblis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 13:49:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/04/25/the-future-of-theoretical-cosmology/#comment-15141</guid>
		<description>I like the idea of computers coming up with theories. I would go even further. In the future, about a few hundreds years from now, computers will be much more powerful than the human brain. Machines will have replaced humans by that time so they would probably do physics, if they are interested in it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I like the idea of computers coming up with theories. I would go even further. In the future, about a few hundreds years from now, computers will be much more powerful than the human brain. Machines will have replaced humans by that time so they would probably do physics, if they are interested in it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob Knop</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/04/25/the-future-of-theoretical-cosmology/#comment-15134</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob Knop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:56:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/04/25/the-future-of-theoretical-cosmology/#comment-15134</guid>
		<description>1000-1500 attendants sounds like a nice numbers....  The last AAS meeting had over 3000, and it felt like too much to me.  It was the first meeting where I really noticed that there were people I knew were there, but I never ran into.  It was too much to take in all at once.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1000-1500 attendants sounds like a nice numbers&#8230;.  The last AAS meeting had over 3000, and it felt like too much to me.  It was the first meeting where I really noticed that there were people I knew were there, but I never ran into.  It was too much to take in all at once.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Political Apathy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/04/25/the-future-of-theoretical-cosmology/#comment-15136</link>
		<dc:creator>Political Apathy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:37:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/04/25/the-future-of-theoretical-cosmology/#comment-15136</guid>
		<description>&lt;strong&gt;Home At Last&lt;/strong&gt;

Whitney and I just got back home from Dallas where we&#8217;ve been attending the April Meeting of the APS.  We got in last Friday night after I presented some posters at the 2006 UHD Student Research Conference, which lasted until about 4pm.
Highlight...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Home At Last</strong></p>
<p>Whitney and I just got back home from Dallas where we&#8217;ve been attending the April Meeting of the APS.  We got in last Friday night after I presented some posters at the 2006 UHD Student Research Conference, which lasted until about 4pm.<br />
Highlight&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam Drake</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/04/25/the-future-of-theoretical-cosmology/#comment-15135</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam Drake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 00:36:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/04/25/the-future-of-theoretical-cosmology/#comment-15135</guid>
		<description>Sean,

Enjoyed your talks at the meeting, you lend a humor to the subject that isn't found in many other talks and tends to keep the audience much more engaged.  Thanks for putting the slides online, perhaps I will lift a few of your graphics for my presentations (don't worry, I'll give credit where it's due).

Best Regards,
Adam Drake</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sean,</p>
<p>Enjoyed your talks at the meeting, you lend a humor to the subject that isn&#8217;t found in many other talks and tends to keep the audience much more engaged.  Thanks for putting the slides online, perhaps I will lift a few of your graphics for my presentations (don&#8217;t worry, I&#8217;ll give credit where it&#8217;s due).</p>
<p>Best Regards,<br />
Adam Drake</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
