<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: String Theory&#8217;s Star on the Rise</title>
	<atom:link href="http://cosmicvariance.com/2006/04/01/string-theorys-star-on-the-rise/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2006/04/01/string-theorys-star-on-the-rise/</link>
	<description>Random samplings from a universe of ideas</description>
	<pubDate>Sun, 07 Sep 2008 13:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Elegant physicist makes string theory sexy &#124; Alanat News</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2006/04/01/string-theorys-star-on-the-rise/#comment-236908</link>
		<dc:creator>Elegant physicist makes string theory sexy &#124; Alanat News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 01:44:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/?p=732#comment-236908</guid>
		<description>[...] In fact, the biggest knock against Greene is that he&#8217;s so busy with public outreach that scientists wonder whether he actually has time for string theory. Last year, for example, he was the subject of a meticulously plotted http://cosmicvariance.com/2006/04/01/string-theorys-star-on-the-rise/ having to do with a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] In fact, the biggest knock against Greene is that he&#8217;s so busy with public outreach that scientists wonder whether he actually has time for string theory. Last year, for example, he was the subject of a meticulously plotted <a href="http://cosmicvariance.com/2006/04/01/string-theorys-star-on-the-rise/" rel="nofollow">http://cosmicvariance.com/2006/04/01/string-theorys-star-on-the-rise/</a> having to do with a star on the Hollywood Walk of Fame. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Questions and Answers about Theories of Everything - Asymptotia</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2006/04/01/string-theorys-star-on-the-rise/#comment-230356</link>
		<dc:creator>Questions and Answers about Theories of Everything - Asymptotia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Mar 2007 02:06:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/?p=732#comment-230356</guid>
		<description>[...] Sometimes the journalists and editors get it right. In fact, they get it right a lot of the time, but you hear more about the complaints (sometimes from me, sometimes elsewhere) about them getting it wrong, when it comes to things like science coverage especially. What am I talking about? I&#8217;m talking about the set of questions and answers that are in a new article on MSNBC that a number of people pointed out to me yesterday and today. It starts out as an article about Brian Greene&#8217;s science outreach efforts (books, and tv and movie appearances, including a new one), with some discussion of how this is regarded by his colleagues, the value it has had in raising public awareness of physics (and fundamental science in general, I would argue), and so forth. (Picture above right is from a fun joke I carried out last year that you can read here - be sure to read the comments too.) All that is interesting, but not nearly as interesting to me right now as the later parts of the article which is simply a question and answer session. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Sometimes the journalists and editors get it right. In fact, they get it right a lot of the time, but you hear more about the complaints (sometimes from me, sometimes elsewhere) about them getting it wrong, when it comes to things like science coverage especially. What am I talking about? I&#8217;m talking about the set of questions and answers that are in a new article on MSNBC that a number of people pointed out to me yesterday and today. It starts out as an article about Brian Greene&#8217;s science outreach efforts (books, and tv and movie appearances, including a new one), with some discussion of how this is regarded by his colleagues, the value it has had in raising public awareness of physics (and fundamental science in general, I would argue), and so forth. (Picture above right is from a fun joke I carried out last year that you can read here - be sure to read the comments too.) All that is interesting, but not nearly as interesting to me right now as the later parts of the article which is simply a question and answer session. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cosmic Variance Goes To Church &#124; Cosmic Variance</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2006/04/01/string-theorys-star-on-the-rise/#comment-19839</link>
		<dc:creator>Cosmic Variance Goes To Church &#124; Cosmic Variance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 26 Apr 2006 03:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/?p=732#comment-19839</guid>
		<description>[...] Ok. I&#8217;m sorry you spilled your beverage all over your front&#8230;.or unwittingly sprayed it all over your monitor! Given some of the things written here at Cosmic Variance in the past, you&#8217;re thinking either I&#8217;m going to burst into flame the moment I set foot into the place of worship, or that this is another -even more elaborate than last time- April Fool Joke perpetrated by cvj, or&#8230;.. the Religious have begun to take over some of your trusted sites on the blogosphere. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Ok. I&#8217;m sorry you spilled your beverage all over your front&#8230;.or unwittingly sprayed it all over your monitor! Given some of the things written here at Cosmic Variance in the past, you&#8217;re thinking either I&#8217;m going to burst into flame the moment I set foot into the place of worship, or that this is another -even more elaborate than last time- April Fool Joke perpetrated by cvj, or&#8230;.. the Religious have begun to take over some of your trusted sites on the blogosphere. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ambitwistor</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2006/04/01/string-theorys-star-on-the-rise/#comment-16470</link>
		<dc:creator>Ambitwistor</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 16:08:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/?p=732#comment-16470</guid>
		<description>My first reaction was, "Man, they give stars out to &lt;em&gt;anyone&lt;/em&gt; these days...  quickly followed by, "Hey...."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My first reaction was, &#8220;Man, they give stars out to <em>anyone</em> these days&#8230;  quickly followed by, &#8220;Hey&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: PK</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2006/04/01/string-theorys-star-on-the-rise/#comment-16464</link>
		<dc:creator>PK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 14:32:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/?p=732#comment-16464</guid>
		<description>I was looking on the Internet Movie Data Base for quite a while, looking for "Brian Green(e)" and never suspected an April Fools joke. And to think that I got up that morning on the lookout for jokes...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was looking on the Internet Movie Data Base for quite a while, looking for &#8220;Brian Green(e)&#8221; and never suspected an April Fools joke. And to think that I got up that morning on the lookout for jokes&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2006/04/01/string-theorys-star-on-the-rise/#comment-16456</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 11:08:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/?p=732#comment-16456</guid>
		<description>What sort of prize will Little Joe receive for solving Clifford's joke? Perhaps, a "string trip" to the Ponderosa. Might be fun...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What sort of prize will Little Joe receive for solving Clifford&#8217;s joke? Perhaps, a &#8220;string trip&#8221; to the Ponderosa. Might be fun&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clifford</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2006/04/01/string-theorys-star-on-the-rise/#comment-16451</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 08:39:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/?p=732#comment-16451</guid>
		<description>Bonanza is the name of the show Lorne Greene is famous for acting in you see.... and Little Joe is one of the characters..... So Little Joe saying "It's a real bonanza for string theory" as a clue that he/she had figured out the role of the Lorne Greene star in the plot....... That sort of killed me for a bit...... really funny....

Then I looked in the internal stuff to see the email of the commenter, and they'd signed it with username Hoss...... that's another Bonanza character..... I was choking for air at that point....

(I guess you had to be there.)

-cvj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bonanza is the name of the show Lorne Greene is famous for acting in you see&#8230;. and Little Joe is one of the characters&#8230;.. So Little Joe saying &#8220;It&#8217;s a real bonanza for string theory&#8221; as a clue that he/she had figured out the role of the Lorne Greene star in the plot&#8230;&#8230;. That sort of killed me for a bit&#8230;&#8230; really funny&#8230;.</p>
<p>Then I looked in the internal stuff to see the email of the commenter, and they&#8217;d signed it with username Hoss&#8230;&#8230; that&#8217;s another Bonanza character&#8230;.. I was choking for air at that point&#8230;.</p>
<p>(I guess you had to be there.)</p>
<p>-cvj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erc</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2006/04/01/string-theorys-star-on-the-rise/#comment-16449</link>
		<dc:creator>erc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 08:21:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/?p=732#comment-16449</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;I hope everyone saw the full joke in the comment by Little Joe including the commentersâ€™s name? To me, that takes the prize!&lt;/i&gt;

No... :(

&lt;i&gt;Gotta runâ€¦.. apple pie to complete.&lt;/i&gt;
Hey! I made apple pie last night!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>I hope everyone saw the full joke in the comment by Little Joe including the commentersâ€™s name? To me, that takes the prize!</i></p>
<p>No&#8230; <img src='http://cosmicvariance.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_sad.gif' alt=':(' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p><i>Gotta runâ€¦.. apple pie to complete.</i><br />
Hey! I made apple pie last night!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lambda T</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2006/04/01/string-theorys-star-on-the-rise/#comment-16437</link>
		<dc:creator>lambda T</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 04:21:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/?p=732#comment-16437</guid>
		<description>Well done, Dr. Johnson!! I was completely fooled!  But it'd be SO cool if Brian Greene actually DID have a star on Hollywood Blvd.!

Hmmm....perhaps there should be a walkway similar to the Hollywood one, except for physicists and other scientists (such as Feynman, Greene, Marie Curie, Fermi, etc.)!!  Instead of stars, their names could be inlayed on top of something physics-related.

Any takers?


...or we could just superimpose physicists' names on the actual Hollywood stars, just for kicks... :-P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well done, Dr. Johnson!! I was completely fooled!  But it&#8217;d be SO cool if Brian Greene actually DID have a star on Hollywood Blvd.!</p>
<p>Hmmm&#8230;.perhaps there should be a walkway similar to the Hollywood one, except for physicists and other scientists (such as Feynman, Greene, Marie Curie, Fermi, etc.)!!  Instead of stars, their names could be inlayed on top of something physics-related.</p>
<p>Any takers?</p>
<p>&#8230;or we could just superimpose physicists&#8217; names on the actual Hollywood stars, just for kicks&#8230; <img src='http://cosmicvariance.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':-P' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stephan</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2006/04/01/string-theorys-star-on-the-rise/#comment-16434</link>
		<dc:creator>Stephan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 03:44:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/?p=732#comment-16434</guid>
		<description>Nice job. You got me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice job. You got me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clifford</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2006/04/01/string-theorys-star-on-the-rise/#comment-16432</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 01:35:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/?p=732#comment-16432</guid>
		<description>Better ask John Smith's permission......

I hope everyone saw the full joke in the comment by Little Joe including the commenters's name? To me, that takes the prize!

Gotta run..... apple pie to complete.

Cheers,

-cvj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Better ask John Smith&#8217;s permission&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>I hope everyone saw the full joke in the comment by Little Joe including the commenters&#8217;s name? To me, that takes the prize!</p>
<p>Gotta run&#8230;.. apple pie to complete.</p>
<p>Cheers,</p>
<p>-cvj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moshe</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2006/04/01/string-theorys-star-on-the-rise/#comment-16431</link>
		<dc:creator>Moshe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 01:03:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/?p=732#comment-16431</guid>
		<description>Clifford, with your permission I will ignore your last comment, the scenario in which you are John Smith is much more beautiful and elegant (abd funny), and we all know that what ultimately matters...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clifford, with your permission I will ignore your last comment, the scenario in which you are John Smith is much more beautiful and elegant (abd funny), and we all know that what ultimately matters&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clifford</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2006/04/01/string-theorys-star-on-the-rise/#comment-16425</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Apr 2006 00:17:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/?p=732#comment-16425</guid>
		<description>What? I've no connection to the John Smith comment guys.  Also, the positioning if the writing as upside down is in fact correct.

Cynthia, the first Sean is not our Sean.


You're all seeing clues, with 20/20 hindsight, that were not in fact clues! :-D 

(And most people don't see the misalignment the first time around... it's something you spot once you've already realized it is a fake.... note the comments finding something wrong with the E in GREENE, or the whole of GREENE itself when those were in fact not doctored at all......)

This is such fun though, isn't it?!

-cvj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What? I&#8217;ve no connection to the John Smith comment guys.  Also, the positioning if the writing as upside down is in fact correct.</p>
<p>Cynthia, the first Sean is not our Sean.</p>
<p>You&#8217;re all seeing clues, with 20/20 hindsight, that were not in fact clues! <img src='http://cosmicvariance.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':-D' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>(And most people don&#8217;t see the misalignment the first time around&#8230; it&#8217;s something you spot once you&#8217;ve already realized it is a fake&#8230;. note the comments finding something wrong with the E in GREENE, or the whole of GREENE itself when those were in fact not doctored at all&#8230;&#8230;)</p>
<p>This is such fun though, isn&#8217;t it?!</p>
<p>-cvj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moshe</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2006/04/01/string-theorys-star-on-the-rise/#comment-16421</link>
		<dc:creator>Moshe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 21:47:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/?p=732#comment-16421</guid>
		<description>Wow, I hadn't noticed that comment, very nicely done, all the classics of the genre are there. Nice job Clif..., ahem, I mean John Smith.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, I hadn&#8217;t noticed that comment, very nicely done, all the classics of the genre are there. Nice job Clif&#8230;, ahem, I mean John Smith.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: erc</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2006/04/01/string-theorys-star-on-the-rise/#comment-16420</link>
		<dc:creator>erc</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 21:07:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/?p=732#comment-16420</guid>
		<description>OK, so it was I who ruined the joke (I'm sorry), so I'll just note what gave it away to me, and then shut up (as I should have done in the first place)...

a) I thought it strange Clifford was (partially) in the photograph: you so often take photos without yourself in them. Why put yourself in unless hoping it would give verisimilitude? 
b)"Brian" and "Greene" are not in the same plane
c) The star is upside-down wrt the other in the photo (though this may be realistic, I don't know)
d) you only linked to one other post in which you expound on your wish for greater inclusion of science in popular culture, when in fact there are several

but the thing which first made me suspicious:
e) comment no. 2 by "John Smith". 
Because it was such an unnecessary comment - so predictable that Clifford had already said don't bother. It was as though a trap had been set and he fell right into it, though it had been pointed out. And then I realised it was a "trap". 

Again, sorry for asking the question.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK, so it was I who ruined the joke (I&#8217;m sorry), so I&#8217;ll just note what gave it away to me, and then shut up (as I should have done in the first place)&#8230;</p>
<p>a) I thought it strange Clifford was (partially) in the photograph: you so often take photos without yourself in them. Why put yourself in unless hoping it would give verisimilitude?<br />
b)&#8221;Brian&#8221; and &#8220;Greene&#8221; are not in the same plane<br />
c) The star is upside-down wrt the other in the photo (though this may be realistic, I don&#8217;t know)<br />
d) you only linked to one other post in which you expound on your wish for greater inclusion of science in popular culture, when in fact there are several</p>
<p>but the thing which first made me suspicious:<br />
e) comment no. 2 by &#8220;John Smith&#8221;.<br />
Because it was such an unnecessary comment - so predictable that Clifford had already said don&#8217;t bother. It was as though a trap had been set and he fell right into it, though it had been pointed out. And then I realised it was a &#8220;trap&#8221;. </p>
<p>Again, sorry for asking the question.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaron Bergman</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2006/04/01/string-theorys-star-on-the-rise/#comment-16417</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaron Bergman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 20:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/?p=732#comment-16417</guid>
		<description>As I initially said, my impression is that a lot of stars are just the result of money donations and publicity campaigns these days, so it didn't seem at all surprising that Brian Greene could have had one. Ryan Seacrest has one, for example.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I initially said, my impression is that a lot of stars are just the result of money donations and publicity campaigns these days, so it didn&#8217;t seem at all surprising that Brian Greene could have had one. Ryan Seacrest has one, for example.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cynthia</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2006/04/01/string-theorys-star-on-the-rise/#comment-16416</link>
		<dc:creator>Cynthia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 19:56:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/?p=732#comment-16416</guid>
		<description>Clifford,my initial gut reaction as I was digesting your blog topic can be summarized as follows: I did not feel complete shock to discover that a string theorist is granted the title as the first physicist in history to gain a star on the walk of fame. Nevertheless, my thoughts on you casting a shadow on "e"  at the end of GREENE turned out to be totally irrelevant to the relevance of your prank. I simply thought Sean was stepping in to drop a clue. If Sean was dropping a clue, it was a misleading clue.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Clifford,my initial gut reaction as I was digesting your blog topic can be summarized as follows: I did not feel complete shock to discover that a string theorist is granted the title as the first physicist in history to gain a star on the walk of fame. Nevertheless, my thoughts on you casting a shadow on &#8220;e&#8221;  at the end of GREENE turned out to be totally irrelevant to the relevance of your prank. I simply thought Sean was stepping in to drop a clue. If Sean was dropping a clue, it was a misleading clue.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: michaeld</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2006/04/01/string-theorys-star-on-the-rise/#comment-16415</link>
		<dc:creator>michaeld</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 19:23:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/?p=732#comment-16415</guid>
		<description>I opened Cosmic Variance actually expecting an April Fools' message but by the end of the message I thought it was probably serious!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I opened Cosmic Variance actually expecting an April Fools&#8217; message but by the end of the message I thought it was probably serious!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Clifford</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2006/04/01/string-theorys-star-on-the-rise/#comment-16413</link>
		<dc:creator>Clifford</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 19:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/?p=732#comment-16413</guid>
		<description>It's a combination of perspective and the fact that the light hits the shiny letters differently. The E is in fact perfect. I made no adjustments to GREENE.

-cvj</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a combination of perspective and the fact that the light hits the shiny letters differently. The E is in fact perfect. I made no adjustments to GREENE.</p>
<p>-cvj</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Little Joe</title>
		<link>http://cosmicvariance.com/2006/04/01/string-theorys-star-on-the-rise/#comment-16412</link>
		<dc:creator>Little Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 Apr 2006 19:01:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://cosmicvariance.com/?p=732#comment-16412</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;
Little Joe (#19):- I laughed out loud for almost a full minute! Youâ€™re brilliant, in that you were closest to the answer, in a flash. Want to tell us more?
&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Not much to tell ... (1) Noticed Mary Brian (2) The second google hit for `hollywood stars sidewalk' has a list of stars by addresses (3) Found a Greene at the same address.  Didn't even have to reach into the fifth dimension.

My first guess was that you had started from a Brian Green because the final E looks askew, but that must be a trick of the light, there are no Brian Greens on the walk.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>
Little Joe (#19):- I laughed out loud for almost a full minute! Youâ€™re brilliant, in that you were closest to the answer, in a flash. Want to tell us more?
</p></blockquote>
<p>Not much to tell &#8230; (1) Noticed Mary Brian (2) The second google hit for `hollywood stars sidewalk&#8217; has a list of stars by addresses (3) Found a Greene at the same address.  Didn&#8217;t even have to reach into the fifth dimension.</p>
<p>My first guess was that you had started from a Brian Green because the final E looks askew, but that must be a trick of the light, there are no Brian Greens on the walk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
