Programming the Universe: A Quantum Computer Scientist Takes On the Cosmos reads aloud surprisingly well. At least Eamon and I thought so, though perhaps the other vacationers didn’t appreciate it as much. I do my part to provide propoganda…

It may be better, to put back laws of physics 100 years or start again. Better to do it now, instead of when the sun is just about to go out. Better put them back 100 years now, rather than 6,000,000,000 years later on…

Don’t build a vessel and call it unsinkable.

Stanford’s Savas Dimopoulos:
New Dimensions in Theoretical Physics

Our new picture is that the 3-D world is embedded in extra dimensions,” says Savas Dimopoulos of Stanford University. “This gives us a totally new perspective for addressing theoretical and experimental problems.

So how would you explain “increased” bulk manifestation?

Seth Lloyd:Now, Seth Lloyd of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology in the US, has used a controversial quantum model called final-state projection to try to solve the paradox. The model holds that under certain extreme circumstances – such as the intense gravitational field of a black hole, objects that would ordinarily have several options for their behaviour have only one. For example, a black hole could cause a coin thrown into it to always come up “heads”.

What this equates to is the Blackhole being a “CONVERSION” location? instance if the Blackhole imposes 100% final state into the coin being “always-heads”, then to gain this knowledge outside of the Blackhole, you must assert that, external to a blackhole, when one tosses a coin it should always turn up TAILS!..if one is dealing with an entangled coin that is.

Problem is that for any coin (say a dollar) that has passed through a blackhole horizon, when it emerges, it loses half its energy(one can assert that the coin no longer has energy of “two” sides, heads or tails, its either heads or either tails). The reduced state function imposed onto any entity that has trancended a blackhole horizon, may confine its state 100%, thereby trapping the knowledge of the dollar’s “toss” function, but does not eradicate the fact that the dollar thrown in, may emerge as a “silver-dollar”, with ist re-configured “two-state-toss” function?

In other words “Quantum -BH- Process” alows 1 dollar bits to be the input, and silver dollars 2-BITS? to be the “GAINED” output.

I believe the information “gain” is a sublte insight on the process of initial and final state paradox?

Just think about the ordinary probability of the coin-toss?..when it comes down heads, you also know it did not come down as tails?..prior to tossing of a coin you have 50% of either, after the event you have “gained” extra knowledge, you have 100% knowldedge..cause and effect?..gaining the knowledge before the coin-toss occurs, one has to subscribe to the ‘Time’ re-configuration initial state principle.

Quantum Mechanics uses the re-normalization process “after” events, Relativity by its status in Space within time, always defeats QM by its processess by default.

Understanding how to decode the outgoing Hawking radiation will require researchers to weave together quantum physics and general relativity into a seamless theory of quantum gravity – a goal that has so far proved elusive. “Until we understand quantum gravity, we’re not going to be running Linux on a black hole,” he jokes.

I wonder, from a layman point of view.

If certain models were used (D brane thinking maybe, I dunno?), it would have had to have been with understanding certain conditions were being meet?

“Abstractness” still needed to bring comprehension of nature’s ways into the realization of the blackhole states?

Would this have raised insight into the “new physics?”

Like maybe “encouraging ideas” about “swimming in honey” or “molasse’s special brand,” as a viscosity statement, and as a way seeing dimensions and energy, travelling with infinite probability like holes, through high energy conditions?

That’s the point, the model had to have been already accomplished in that unification?

Gulp:)

Don’t know what am talking about! Have a think about it next time you use someone else’s toilet.

Quantum mechanics, looks to me like an information theory. A quantum computer sounds like how you would imagine a blackhole to work, you think there is twice as much information in there, but when you look, half of it seems to be missing. It not really missing tho, is it? It just that! Information, if it was space-time would be traveling through it self. The information would be curved back and traveling away from us, we cant see it because it’s wave function is rotated(we dont see information through time we just remember what we see through space. If both wave functions are rotated into a superpostion then you are looking at whatever it was, you rememberd last). Seeing stars through time, 13 billon years ago? I don’t think so… your seeing them 13 billion years through space. No information as ever travel tho time. Time would be created by rotated information, through the surface of an un-observed space. Blackholes would not stop time but create the illusion of it

[URL=http://www.newscientistspace.com/article/dn8836-black-holes-the-ultimate-quantum-computers.html]black holes the ultimate quantum computers[/URL]

http://www.newscientistspace.com/article/dn8836-black-holes-the-ultimate-quantum-computers.html

At one degree rotation from salad, probability of food being considered steak is low. Ok. But how does 90 one-degree rotations add upp to 90*[that low number]; why does not probability of steak increase as we approach the (90-degree) opposite of salad? At 45 degrees, for example, have not food “arrived at” equal superposition?

It seems to me as if probability of waking pup would be very high indeed after repeatadly letting it sniff high-probability steak.

Where do I go wrong?

Quantum mechanics is the coolest thing ever invented, ever.

I think you meant “Quantum mechanics is very very very very nearly the coolest thing ever invented, ever.”

Kevin