<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/2.3.1" -->
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Is this a date?</title>
	<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/02/07/is-this-a-date/</link>
	<description>Random samplings from a universe of ideas.</description>
	<pubDate>Mon, 01 Dec 2008 20:51:17 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Arbitrary Chronological Signifiers &#124; Cosmic Variance</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/02/07/is-this-a-date/#comment-11792</link>
		<dc:creator>Arbitrary Chronological Signifiers &#124; Cosmic Variance</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 31 Dec 2006 19:09:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/02/07/is-this-a-date/#comment-11792</guid>
		<description>[...] Is This a Date? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Is This a Date? [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: citrine</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/02/07/is-this-a-date/#comment-11767</link>
		<dc:creator>citrine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:03:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/02/07/is-this-a-date/#comment-11767</guid>
		<description>I think that just the coffee part is harmless, but when coffee + everyday conversation segues into personal territory ... that's when the trouble starts. To avoid this (potential) slippery slope I've learnt to keep strict boundaries between the personal and the professional, even with women, as gossip has a high velocity of propagation! I know this may sound pretty stand-offish but it's worked for me so far. :)

This means that

a) colleagues do not know anything personal about me except for my hobbies and interests

b) my friends and colleagues fall into non-intersecting sets

c) anyone who brings up the "my wife/ g.f. doesn't understand me" line will get the "I'm in Physics and Math, I'm not very good with giving advice on personal stuff" response from me - said nicely but firmly. Only  friends get the benefit of my personal side.

Anyway, the ppl I've met in Math/Physics have not been interested in discussing anything uncomfortably close to heart, so I've never really been tested on this!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think that just the coffee part is harmless, but when coffee + everyday conversation segues into personal territory &#8230; that&#8217;s when the trouble starts. To avoid this (potential) slippery slope I&#8217;ve learnt to keep strict boundaries between the personal and the professional, even with women, as gossip has a high velocity of propagation! I know this may sound pretty stand-offish but it&#8217;s worked for me so far. <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
This means that</p>
<p>a) colleagues do not know anything personal about me except for my hobbies and interests</p>
<p>b) my friends and colleagues fall into non-intersecting sets</p>
<p>c) anyone who brings up the &#8220;my wife/ g.f. doesn&#8217;t understand me&#8221; line will get the &#8220;I&#8217;m in Physics and Math, I&#8217;m not very good with giving advice on personal stuff&#8221; response from me - said nicely but firmly. Only  friends get the benefit of my personal side.</p>
<p>Anyway, the ppl I&#8217;ve met in Math/Physics have not been interested in discussing anything uncomfortably close to heart, so I&#8217;ve never really been tested on this!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quibbler</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/02/07/is-this-a-date/#comment-11766</link>
		<dc:creator>Quibbler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Feb 2006 23:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/02/07/is-this-a-date/#comment-11766</guid>
		<description>On the bright side, if your colleagues want to date you, it also means that they *talk* to you occasionally.  It's taken me &lt;i&gt;weeks&lt;/i&gt; to get my British male informatics classmates to acknowledge my personhood.  It used to be that, on the rare occasions when they would talk to me it was to ask for help on an assignment, but I didn't get responses to courtesy phrases like "hi."  We're doing better now -- they talk to me in full sentences about stuff other than differential equations. (Of course they have always been perfectly capable of talking to other British males.)

--Q.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>On the bright side, if your colleagues want to date you, it also means that they *talk* to you occasionally.  It&#8217;s taken me <i>weeks</i> to get my British male informatics classmates to acknowledge my personhood.  It used to be that, on the rare occasions when they would talk to me it was to ask for help on an assignment, but I didn&#8217;t get responses to courtesy phrases like &#8220;hi.&#8221;  We&#8217;re doing better now &#8212; they talk to me in full sentences about stuff other than differential equations. (Of course they have always been perfectly capable of talking to other British males.)</p>
<p>&#8211;Q.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Known Stranger &#187; Is this a date ?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/02/07/is-this-a-date/#comment-11791</link>
		<dc:creator>Known Stranger &#187; Is this a date ?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 17:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/02/07/is-this-a-date/#comment-11791</guid>
		<description>[...] Is this a date ? It's not so much that men are bad at reading signals â€" they just read them whether they are there or not. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Is this a date ? It&#8217;s not so much that men are bad at reading signals â€&#8221; they just read them whether they are there or not. [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amara</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/02/07/is-this-a-date/#comment-11790</link>
		<dc:creator>Amara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 14:02:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/02/07/is-this-a-date/#comment-11790</guid>
		<description>Harv: "The whole "not dating within your department", is that a small department thing? Or is it a function more of the culture of the department?"


I know, it's a fuzzy boundary:

Perhaps a little of both of what you say (small department, culture of the department). Workplaces could have a thousand/more people with many departments, and each department could be large too, so then a rule not to date those in a very large environment (for ex. a large company) doesn't seem like a reasonable rule. Also, my rule might look strange in the culture (Italy) where I'm working now because I see many husband/wife(s) researchers working with each other (I think it is part of the family aspect of the culture). Finally, if the work area is at home (home office) as a consultant, say, then such a rule doesn't seem appropriate.

In a research or academic environment, the farther in physical space, the better for me, for who I could think as 'dateable'. If I consider one of my typical research areas where I've worked, I break down the 'dateable' rule like this:

Within my close Working Group (usually 10-20 people): No.

Within my Department (several working groups, ~50 people): No.

Within my Division (several departments, ~200-400 people): I prefer not, but I don't rule it out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Harv: &#8220;The whole &#8220;not dating within your department&#8221;, is that a small department thing? Or is it a function more of the culture of the department?&#8221;</p>
<p>I know, it&#8217;s a fuzzy boundary:</p>
<p>Perhaps a little of both of what you say (small department, culture of the department). Workplaces could have a thousand/more people with many departments, and each department could be large too, so then a rule not to date those in a very large environment (for ex. a large company) doesn&#8217;t seem like a reasonable rule. Also, my rule might look strange in the culture (Italy) where I&#8217;m working now because I see many husband/wife(s) researchers working with each other (I think it is part of the family aspect of the culture). Finally, if the work area is at home (home office) as a consultant, say, then such a rule doesn&#8217;t seem appropriate.</p>
<p>In a research or academic environment, the farther in physical space, the better for me, for who I could think as &#8216;dateable&#8217;. If I consider one of my typical research areas where I&#8217;ve worked, I break down the &#8216;dateable&#8217; rule like this:</p>
<p>Within my close Working Group (usually 10-20 people): No.</p>
<p>Within my Department (several working groups, ~50 people): No.</p>
<p>Within my Division (several departments, ~200-400 people): I prefer not, but I don&#8217;t rule it out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harv</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/02/07/is-this-a-date/#comment-11765</link>
		<dc:creator>Harv</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2006 07:28:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/02/07/is-this-a-date/#comment-11765</guid>
		<description>The whole "not dating within your department", is that a small department thing?  Or is it a function more of the culture of the department?

We have a large grad student population (for astronomy - 38) and ~25% of them (including myself) are dating each other or a former grad student who has since graduated.

Then again, all the women on the faculty are married to astronomy faculty.

And also, our dept. has tended to be more open, family friendly, encouraging of outside activities, etc. than some others.

We do worry more about the two body problem here</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The whole &#8220;not dating within your department&#8221;, is that a small department thing?  Or is it a function more of the culture of the department?</p>
<p>We have a large grad student population (for astronomy - 38) and ~25% of them (including myself) are dating each other or a former grad student who has since graduated.</p>
<p>Then again, all the women on the faculty are married to astronomy faculty.</p>
<p>And also, our dept. has tended to be more open, family friendly, encouraging of outside activities, etc. than some others.</p>
<p>We do worry more about the two body problem here</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Poppycock</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/02/07/is-this-a-date/#comment-11789</link>
		<dc:creator>Poppycock</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 19:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/02/07/is-this-a-date/#comment-11789</guid>
		<description>Very good, Elliot! :D That is exactly the sort of thing I've had happen!

Amara: Absolutely there is a spectrum, and light-hearted banter/teasing is something I enjoy(ed). The trouble comes when someone starts to think/hope that it is meant seriously. I think perhaps the trouble is I am &lt;i&gt;not&lt;/i&gt; easily offended, and am quite open as I said upthread, and so what to me is normal behaviour to someone less open seems like an invite to get closer.

bittergradstudent: I think your wishes re. the media apply in a lot more context than just harrassment. They very frequently don't include any background or include the whole story.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very good, Elliot! <img src='http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /> That is exactly the sort of thing I&#8217;ve had happen!</p>
<p>Amara: Absolutely there is a spectrum, and light-hearted banter/teasing is something I enjoy(ed). The trouble comes when someone starts to think/hope that it is meant seriously. I think perhaps the trouble is I am <i>not</i> easily offended, and am quite open as I said upthread, and so what to me is normal behaviour to someone less open seems like an invite to get closer.</p>
<p>bittergradstudent: I think your wishes re. the media apply in a lot more context than just harrassment. They very frequently don&#8217;t include any background or include the whole story.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bittergradstudent</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/02/07/is-this-a-date/#comment-11788</link>
		<dc:creator>bittergradstudent</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 16:40:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/02/07/is-this-a-date/#comment-11788</guid>
		<description>I've always wondered how much of the nervousness people have re: harrassment in the USA is due to media hype about a few isolated cases.  I wish the media would talk more about how widespread things are, citing statistics and historical prescedent, than simply cite a couple of cases.  Not to mention a survey of workplaces to objectively show how widespread it is.  Ah well</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve always wondered how much of the nervousness people have re: harrassment in the USA is due to media hype about a few isolated cases.  I wish the media would talk more about how widespread things are, citing statistics and historical prescedent, than simply cite a couple of cases.  Not to mention a survey of workplaces to objectively show how widespread it is.  Ah well</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elliot</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/02/07/is-this-a-date/#comment-11787</link>
		<dc:creator>Elliot</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 15:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/02/07/is-this-a-date/#comment-11787</guid>
		<description>limerick time

A collegue and I went for coffee
I guess I'm too much of a softy
Cause after the latte
Then thickens the plot eh?
Cause now I can't get the guy off me.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>limerick time</p>
<p>A collegue and I went for coffee<br />
I guess I&#8217;m too much of a softy<br />
Cause after the latte<br />
Then thickens the plot eh?<br />
Cause now I can&#8217;t get the guy off me.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Amara</title>
		<link>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/02/07/is-this-a-date/#comment-11786</link>
		<dc:creator>Amara</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2006 13:02:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://blogs.discovermagazine.com/cosmicvariance/2006/02/07/is-this-a-date/#comment-11786</guid>
		<description>Doesn't flirting go both ways? (meaning amongst women and men)

I think that there's a spectrum, like many aspects of human interactions. Note that the culture you're in embeds its own rules too. Crudely the variation of flirting might look like this:

-light (harmless, playful),

-annoying (in which case, the offended party should say something to him/her),

-heavy (harassment, here if the offended didn't say something, they certainly should, and if it continues, then talk to your boss/his/her/boss to stop it.

I am sure that all of my coworkers and me in all of my jobs over the years have engaged in the light variety. I don't see a problem with that, in fact why not enjoy being the women and men that we are? Our work occupies a large part of our lives usually, so it's nice when different facets enter to make it more enjoyable. Everyone has their own thresholds for the annoying kind of flirting. I agree that harassment kind has no place in the workplace, it creates a poisonous ambiance.

My mother years ago told me that she feels sad for how far the harassment statutes have gone in the US workplace. It's a heavy weight for the guys to carry, that is,  not being able to relax with what they say or do around a woman at work because that woman might be offended.

One would think that a relaxed workplace is a productive workplace, yes?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Doesn&#8217;t flirting go both ways? (meaning amongst women and men)</p>
<p>I think that there&#8217;s a spectrum, like many aspects of human interactions. Note that the culture you&#8217;re in embeds its own rules too. Crudely the variation of flirting might look like this:</p>
<p>-light (harmless, playful),</p>
<p>-annoying (in which case, the offended party should say something to him/her),</p>
<p>-heavy (harassment, here if the offended didn&#8217;t say something, they certainly should, and if it continues, then talk to your boss/his/her/boss to stop it.</p>
<p>I am sure that all of my coworkers and me in all of my jobs over the years have engaged in the light variety. I don&#8217;t see a problem with that, in fact why not enjoy being the women and men that we are? Our work occupies a large part of our lives usually, so it&#8217;s nice when different facets enter to make it more enjoyable. Everyone has their own thresholds for the annoying kind of flirting. I agree that harassment kind has no place in the workplace, it creates a poisonous ambiance.</p>
<p>My mother years ago told me that she feels sad for how far the harassment statutes have gone in the US workplace. It&#8217;s a heavy weight for the guys to carry, that is,  not being able to relax with what they say or do around a woman at work because that woman might be offended.</p>
<p>One would think that a relaxed workplace is a productive workplace, yes?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
