Comments on: More Refined Divining Tool Launched

By: New IPod Shuffle more Nano than Nano - Asymptotia

New IPod Shuffle more Nano than Nano - Asymptotia — Wed, 13 Sep 2006 02:32:22 +0000

[...] Remember a year ago, the launch of the ipod nano that caught my eye? Even led to a long physics joke explanation. [...]

By: Bad Physics Joke Explained, Part I | Cosmic Variance

Bad Physics Joke Explained, Part I | Cosmic Variance — Fri, 09 Sep 2005 03:37:59 +0000

[...] In the comment thread of a recent post on the iPod Nano, there was discussion of the practice of borrowing terms from physics and other sciences to make a product more attractive. Responding to various humourous suggestions of other names they may use upon further miniaturization, such as the iPod Femto or the iPod Atto (suggested by Joe Bolte), I suggested: clearly they are moving toward the â€œipod Planckâ€, which would be the smallest ipod possible (while still being recognizable as an ipod). Also, the number of songs it will be able to store will be limited by its surface area, and not its volume. [...]

By: Clifford

Clifford — Thu, 08 Sep 2005 17:21:34 +0000

Thanks astromcnaught! Good to hear from the non-specialists from time to time…. sometimes I like to be reminded that you’re here…at least so that I can occasionally post an explanation of one of my poor physics jokes, or other off-the-cuff remarks spiced with physics….. Got several meetings and other thigns to do today…will try to explain holography later this evening.

Best…

-cvj

By: astromcnaught

astromcnaught — Thu, 08 Sep 2005 15:44:00 +0000

Hello Clifford,
Here is a non-specialist who reads this blog to find out about what you’re on about.
I think it is amazing to be able to eavesdrop, as it were, on professors argu, er, discussing the latest inventions of modern physics.

Makes me think of the London coffee houses of the late 17th century where the big noises from the Royal Society gathered to discuss the latest inventions. There was no bar, as far as I know on more humble folk from joining in.

Therefore, a post about the holographic principle, and why it is a principle and not a conjecture, would be most splendid.

By: Clifford

Clifford — Thu, 08 Sep 2005 05:42:07 +0000

Not you Plato, you know! I’m trying to find out if there are any non-specialists reading thsi blog any more who want to know what we’re on about…. Drumming up an excuse to write a post about the holographic principle, I guess.

-cvj

By: Plato

Plato — Thu, 08 Sep 2005 04:35:53 +0000

If anyone wants me to explain it, please leave a comment

I’ll byte. Go ahead and explain.

By: Clifford

Clifford — Thu, 08 Sep 2005 03:50:52 +0000

Astronomy Grad Student: That was hilarious!! Just brilliant. Thanks for the link!

-cvj

By: Astronomy Grad Student

Astronomy Grad Student — Thu, 08 Sep 2005 02:55:03 +0000

oops, my bad for the ridiculously long link that spills out of the section…

By: Astronomy Grad Student

Astronomy Grad Student — Thu, 08 Sep 2005 02:53:44 +0000

Nah, they’re gonna stop using the techno/sciency sounding names and are gonna go for animal names. Haven’t you guys seen the “iPod Flea”?
http://www.nytimes.com/video/html/2005/06/29/technology/highbandwidth/windowsmedia/20050629_GUEST_VIDEO.html
it’s just a spoof video, of course, but who says this is not the future of the mp3 player?

By: Clifford

Clifford — Thu, 08 Sep 2005 01:38:25 +0000

Joe: - clearly they are moving toward the “ipod Planck”, which would be the smallest ipod possible (while still being recognizable as an ipod). Also, the number of songs it will be able to store will be limited by its surface area, and not its volume.

This is a sort of geeky string theorist’s joke, for which I apologize. (Well, only slightly! ) If anyone wants me to explain it, please leave a comment.

Cheers,

-cvj

By: Joe Bolte

Joe Bolte — Thu, 08 Sep 2005 00:41:56 +0000

The name may seem cool now, but what happens a couple of iterations down the road, when Apple has run out of publically recognizable metric prefixes? Everyone is familiar with “micro-” and to some extend “pico-” but soon they are going to have to start calling them iPod Femto and iPod Atto, and where’s the sexiness in that? Apple made the wrong move by skipping over the iPod Micro name, and they’ll wish they had asked my advice soon enough…

By: Quantoken

Quantoken — Thu, 08 Sep 2005 00:13:36 +0000

Probably nobody wants to talk about it. But a few months ago Fox broadcasted a docudrama “Oil Storm”, which hypothesised what will happen when there is a labor day hurricane of category 5 in New Orleans, 2005:

http://www.fxnetworks.com/shows/originals/oilstorm/main.html

Well, as we know it. Things exactly happened as Fox predicted, at exactly the right time it predicted, although it was meant as a hypothesis, not a prediction. And everything happened exactly as predicted.

All I can say is we may NOT have seen the worst of the aftermath yet. Isn’t it alarming enough that we should start to talk about what will happen when the world runs out of oil? It’s not science fiction. It’s not a hypothesis. It’s a coming reality no one can deny. At most there can be some disagreement no more than a few year when it is going to come, but the earth is limited and so are resources.

Quantoken

By: Moshe Rozali

Moshe Rozali — Thu, 08 Sep 2005 00:06:55 +0000

That’s very good Clifford, nano-leap would be an excellent term to promote.

By: Clifford

Clifford — Wed, 07 Sep 2005 23:44:06 +0000

Well, Moshe, if it will stop people using “Quantum Leap” in precisely the opposite sense of what it actually means, this will be progress.

-cvj

By: Moshe Rozali

Moshe Rozali — Wed, 07 Sep 2005 23:32:34 +0000

Clifford,

Apple is usually the first in the cuteness category, alas I own already creative’s Zen-Nano, which is doubly cute (and the combination is hard to beat for the nonsense value). I am afraid “nano” is already replacing “quantum” as the vaguely high-tech sounding word.

By: Tim

Tim — Wed, 07 Sep 2005 23:00:38 +0000

You gotta admit, the nano Tubes things is cute.